home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: news.sprintlink.net!news1!news
- From: thunter@iquest.net (Anthony J. Hunter)
- Subject: MFC or OWL?
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ts11-ind-28.iquest.net
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Message-ID: <DKKv8H.K35@iquest.net>
- Sender: news@iquest.net (News Admin)
- Organization: ARACAE Business Solutions
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 23:43:29 GMT
-
- I have been using Turbo C++ for about a year getting used to C++. I am
- now ready to get definitely serious about C++, like, for a living
- serious! I have installed VC++ 4.0 and man I tell you, that stuff is
- rocket science! OWL on the other hand is easier and more straight
- forward. Design your GUI and build your classes. MFC creates this
- skeleton program of GREEK stuff! So, seriously, what do you guys and
- gals think the future is, MFC or OWL. I am inclined to go with OWL, but
- I need true objectivity. Suggestions please! PS. Borland compiles
- faster too!
-
-